|
THE LEGAL SIDE OF HOMESCHOOLING:
An Overview of the Legal Risks and their Solutions
The
Academy endorses the work of the HSLDA.
by
Thomas R. Orr, Esq.
|

|
| Thomas
R. Orr, Esq., the President of The Angelicum
Academy, graduated cum laude from the University
of Washington; graduated magna cum laude
from the Puget Sound Law School; was a Sergeant
on the Seattle police force; is a Lieutenant
Commander (Sel) in U.S. Naval Intelligence;
a member of the U.S. Supreme Court Bar.
Tom lives with his wife Pam and two sons
in Federal Way, WA.
|
|
|
Families
homeschooling for the first time often have questions about
legal challenges or threats that they might face from local
or state education authorities. Those who do seek an answer
to these questions are often faced with a confusing array
of laws, policies, and regulations that not only vary from
state to state, but also between school districts, and school
officials within the same state or district.1
In response to this confusion, many already involved in homeschooling
have joined associations like the Home School Legal Defense
Association ("HSLDA"). Such associations provide
some excellent reference materials, ongoing newsletters, and
other informational materials.2 Their
most prominent feature, however, is the limited legal services
that they offer in exchange for an annual insurance-like fee.
Such associations also often conduct high-visibility lobbying
efforts to promote changes in federal, state and local laws
related to homeschooling. We applaud and endorse the good
intentions and work of the HSLDA, and all those who likewise
seek to protect and benefit all homeschoolers. The Great Books
Academy is an HSLDA member organization, allowing its members
to obtain a discounted membership.
Do you
need legal insurance? Do you need to join an association to
protect your legal interests? If you are in a state or school
district involved in on-going harassment of homeschoolers,
or denial of their rights, then it might be a very good idea
to get the insurance and join a homeschool legal defense organization.
But, is there a realistic chance that local authorities will
challenge you legally if you homeschool?
Despite
the headlines that one occasionally sees, statistics establish
that very few these families will face an in-court battle.
For example, a study of cases handled by one homeschool defense
association between 1984 and 1990 showed that out of thousands
of families served by the organization, only twenty-eight
had ever had contact from local officials. Of those twenty-eight,
only eighteen families were summoned to court. Seventeen of
those families won their day in court and, most significantly,
sixteen of the families won without a lawyer.3
As one prominent attorney explains: "Even in restrictive
states, the percentage of parents who actually get prosecuted
is only a little higher than the percentage who get struck
by lightning. They're very selective about who they prosecute,
and the vast majority of parents, even in these states, get
left alone."4
This is
not to say that local school districts and superintendents
will not, on rare occasions harass homeschoolers, or that
local child protective services, who are sometimes biased
against homeschooling families, will not investigate homeschooling
families based on false reports of child abuse. Indeed, some
recent reports out of California would indicate that these
tactics, particularly false claims of child abuse against
homeschooling parents, are on the rise. These cases can and
do happen - but to a small minority. Careful adherence to
local and state laws is the ounce of prevention that will
avoid the pound of cure needed through legal action.
What should
you do if you find yourself in this unfortunate minority?
HSLDA is a good place to start, but if you are not a member,
they are free, of course, not to accept you as one once a
problem has already arisen. As a trial lawyer experienced
in litigation involving school districts and other government
entities, I would suggest that consulting with an experienced
local lawyer is a good first step. Specialized law firms experienced
in state law and state courts generally represent school districts.
A good counterbalance to such experienced local adversaries
is a local attorney or firm with well-established relationships
in the local business, political and judicial community. The
attorney should be one with a command of local law and procedure,
the ability to work out problems short of litigation, and
a reputation for a willingness to take worthy cases to trial.
But a call to the HSLDA is an inexpensive place to start,
and they might be able to refer you to a good local attorney
experienced in these matters.
Bringing
in a national homeschool defense organization, if you are
a member, is a step that should be carefully considered. Such
associations may bring expertise, knowledge and additional
resources that can prove helpful. But they can also bring
a level of publicity and a litigation strategy that is counterproductive
to a quick resolution in the best interests of the family.
Although laudatory in their goals and efforts, these associations
have also been criticized on other levels. Some have criticized
such associations, we think unfairly, for: fostering an unwarranted
dependency on their services; imposing their own ideas of
what is the best homeschool method; requiring the same information
from members that is demanded by hostile school officials
(i.e. test results, curriculum, academic background of the
parent, notification of previous contact with officials, etc.);
lacking the requisite familiarity before local and state courts;5
engaging in legal actions and legislative lobbying that might
inadvertently strengthen state and local control over homeschooling
families.6 However, criticism does not
always equate with reality, and is often unfair and ill-motivated,
so you need to consider and form your own judgements on these
matters. In our opinion, the HSLDA has been of absolutely
enormous help and assistance to the great majority of homeschoolers
they have represented, and to the homeschool movement as a
whole, and as stated above, we endorse their work.
Families
should approach legal challenges with the same courage and
individuality that they originally approached the question
of whether to homeschool. As the U.S. Supreme Court has observed:
"The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments
in this Union repose excludes any general power of the state
to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction
from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature
of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny
have the right coupled with the high duty to recognize and
prepare him for additional duties."7
Most states
recognize the foregoing principle in some form or another
and, with each passing year, homeschooling is becoming more
and more accepted. Indeed, one recent study estimated that
there are at least 1.23 million homeschooled children (other
estimates range to over 2 million).8
Legal challenges from school officials are the exception -
not the rule. This gives parents the ability and the duty
to put out small legal fires before they flare up into uncontrolled
litigation conflagrations.
Knowledge
of your state's regulations and precompliance with them provides
a safe harbor. Indeed, the minority of cases that do end up
in court generally stem from a failure of the parents to follow
basic state or local laws from the outset. If you receive
an inquiry from a school official, handle it tactfully and
without threats. Often a courteous phone call is all that
is required. If your initial efforts are not successful, quietly
consult HSLDA or a local lawyer on the best way to solve the
problem and avoid litigation.
In essence,
making decisions in this area, as in all others, calls for
the very thing instilled by a true classical education - the
ability to make right judgements based on a proper balance
of a well-formed intellect, good and sufficient information,
and the moral virtues of prudence and justice.
LEGAL SIDE - ENDNOTES
1 Oklahoma was selected for the Academy's
Administration Office due to its very favorable environment
for homeschooling. Oklahoma is the only state with a constitutional
provision guaranteeing the right to homeschool. Section 4,
Article 13 of the Constitution of Oklahoma authorizes "other
means of education", referring to homeschooling,
in lieu of attendance at any school. If a parent is teaching
the basic subjects 180 days per year, that is all the law
requires (70 O.S.A. Sec. 1-110). Oklahoma has no teacher qualifications
or tests for homeschools. In fact, the State Department of
Education has no jurisdiction over homeschools. Snyder v.
Asbery (No. 78,045, Okla. Ct. App., Div. 2, May 18, 1993).
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled that"Under our
form of government...the home is considered the keystone of
the governmental structure. In this empire, parents rule supreme
during the minority of their children...they may...withdraw
them from public schools and send them to private schools,
or provide for them other means of education. See 70 O.S.
1991 Sec. 3-104...Okla. Const. Art. 13, Sec. 5..." School
Brd. Dist. No. 18 v. Thompson, 103 P. 578, 24 Okla. 1
(1909). This highly supportive approach to homeschooling is
part of Oklahoma's populist legacy, and is still reflected
in the very positive attitude Oklahomans have towards homeschooling.
2 For example, the Home School Legal Defense
Association ("HSLDA") publishes a brief and concise
summary of the laws of all fifty states pertaining to Homeschooling.
See C. KLICKA, HOMESCHOOLING IN THE UNITED STATES: A LEGAL
ANALYSIS (rev. 1999). This resource provides a good basic
starting point for families with questions about homeschooling
law in their state. You can order this book directly from
HSLDA by calling 1-540-338-5600. If you have access to the
Internet, a great source of information on state homeschooling
laws and general legal questions can be found at http://www.home-ed-press.com/HSRSC/hsrsc_lws.rgs.html.
3 Montgomery, Must I Buy Homeschool Insurance?,
THE LEARNING EDGE (March, 1991).
4 Eidsmoe, Moore Teleconference on Homeschooling
(April, 1995) (as quoted in M. & H. HEGENER, Homeschooling
Freedoms At Risk, HOME EDUCATION MAGAZINE (May/June 1996);
reproduced online at http://www.home-edmagazine.com /INF/FREE/hsinfo_far1.html).
5 Blackwelder v. Safnauer, 689 F.
Supp. 106, 113, n.2 (N.D.N.Y. 1988) (In this case, the Court
took the attorney for the homeschool association to task for
failure to follow basic court procedure: "The progress
of this case has been hindered by plaintiffs' failure to adhere
to the procedural framework of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and this court's local rules. The court has been
indulgent - perhaps too indulgent - in forgiving a multitude
of procedural errors, because it has not wanted to punish
the individual plaintiffs [parents of homeschooled children]
for the shoddy motion practice of their attorneys. There comes
a point, however, when forbearance of one party's carelessness
unfairly prejudices their adversaries. That point has been
reached in this case . . . Plaintiffs' attorney should be
aware of the existence of this rule; the other parties involved
in this action as well as the court itself have repeatedly
referred plaintiffs' attorney to the Local Rules, seemingly
to no avail . . . Therefore the Court will consider the facts
set out in Defendants' [statement] as uncontested . . . [and]
will deem them as admitted [by plaintiffs].")
6 See e.g. M. & H. HEGENER, Homeschooling
Freedoms At Risk, HOME EDUCATION MAGAZINE (May/June 1996);
reproduced online at http://www.home-edmagazine.com/INF/FREE/hsinfo_
far1.html.
7 Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of
the Holy Names of Jesus & Mary, 268 U.S. 510, 535,
45 S.Ct. 571, 573, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925); see also Prince
v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166, 64 S.Ct. 438, 88
L.Ed. 645 (1944). The U.S. Supreme Court has recently affirmed
and underscored the importance of its holding in Pierce. See
Troxel v. Granville, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2065, 68 U.S.L.W.
4458 (June 5, 2000) (Souter, J. concurring); see also
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 233, 92 S.Ct. 1526,
1542, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972).
8 Several studies of homeschool growth rates
have been undertaken. They include a study performed for the
U.S. Department of Education. See P. LINES, Homeschoolers:
Estimating Numbers and Growth, NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT, CURRICULUM, AND AS-SESSMENT, OFFICE OF
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND IMPROVEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
(Web Edition, Spring 1999)(http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/homeschool/);
P. LINES, Homeschooling: An Overview for Education Policy
Makers (rev. March 1997). Dr. Lines's study for the U.S.
Department of Education estimated the homeschool population
at 750,000 in 1995-96 and 1,000,000 in 1997-98. Dr. Lines
estimates an annual growth rate between 7% and 15% with a
15% percent growth rate being most consistent with past growth.
The charts above are based on Dr. Line's numbers and her estimated
growth rate of 15%.
The HSLDA has also sponsored a study of homeschool
growth rates. B. RAY, Strengths of Their Own: Home Schoolers
Across America, National Home Education Research Institute
(1997); B. Ray & HSLDA, Home Education Across the
United States, http://www.hslda.org/central/statsandreports
/ray1997/2.stm; see also Facts on Home Schooling, NATIONAL
HOME EDUCATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE, http://www.nheri.org
/research/general .html).
As a result of their research, Dr. Ray, NHERI,
and HSLDA estimate that there were between 1,103,000 and 1,348,000
home school students in the United States during the fall
of 1996. They estimate a growth rate between 15% and 40% per
year. Id. They point out that this number is comparable to
the ninth and tenth ranked states in public school populations
nationwide (Georgia and New Jersey), and that this number
exceeds the combined public school populations of Wyoming,
Vermont, Delaware, North Dakota, Alaska, South Dakota, Rhode
Island, Montana, and Hawaii. Id.i
|
Welcome
| First
Issue
| Second
Issue
| Third
Issue
| Fourth
Issue
|Contact
Us
| Links
|
|